<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital mixing – missing the visual approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livemusicbusiness.com/audio-engineering-general/digital-mixing-%e2%80%93-missing-the-visual-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livemusicbusiness.com/audio-engineering-general/digital-mixing-%e2%80%93-missing-the-visual-approach/</link>
	<description>Advice, help and comment on the live music business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:32:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cas Schalkx</title>
		<link>http://livemusicbusiness.com/audio-engineering-general/digital-mixing-%e2%80%93-missing-the-visual-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Cas Schalkx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livemusicbusiness.com/?p=69#comment-185</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have always felt that mixing for FOH is an instinctive process, based on emotional responses towards a more creative process.&quot;

Absolutely 100% true! In essence it is all physics of course. But it is influenced by so many variables that the physics behind it are too difficult to comprehend. So it comes down to the art of getting it &quot;right&quot;. Also the same reason why there are so many stories/fables on how to get a good sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have always felt that mixing for FOH is an instinctive process, based on emotional responses towards a more creative process.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely 100% true! In essence it is all physics of course. But it is influenced by so many variables that the physics behind it are too difficult to comprehend. So it comes down to the art of getting it &#8220;right&#8221;. Also the same reason why there are so many stories/fables on how to get a good sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://livemusicbusiness.com/audio-engineering-general/digital-mixing-%e2%80%93-missing-the-visual-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livemusicbusiness.com/?p=69#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I agree to disagree,you can offcause see an digital desk but it looks different than analog,first of all dig.has a small hands on workspace &amp; all different layers,I think to see a digital desk you have look in a wider spectrum &amp; put all the layers together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to disagree,you can offcause see an digital desk but it looks different than analog,first of all dig.has a small hands on workspace &amp; all different layers,I think to see a digital desk you have look in a wider spectrum &amp; put all the layers together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
